1948 was the year the movie "The Red Shoes" was made. Even though it took place over 60 years ago, modern women are still dealing with the same issues. Can women "have it all"? I decided to watch this movie after it was mentioned in the documentary "Searching for Debra Winger".
At the end of "The Red Shoes", the evil ballet owner pushes the leading actress to make a choice, "No one can have two lives - and yours is dancing". When it appears that she will choose being a wife over dancing, the ballet owner sneers at her, "Go, be a faithful housewife and be finished with dancing forever". In the end, she chooses dancing, her passion, and her husband leaves her. The ballet owner reassures her, "Sorrow will pass - life is so unimportant". The message is clear: women can't have it all. The ballerina chooses not to live in the end, and she dances in front of a train. I suppose she assumed it would be better to have nothing at all than to choose between her career (her passion) and her husband (the love of her life).
Modern women are still facing these same choices, but the decisions we need to make aren't as extreme as they were in 1948. I've been doing some light reading on the subject. Right now, I'm reading "Midlife Crisis at 30: How the Stakes Have Changed for a New Generation - and What to Do About It" by Lia Macko and Kerry Rubin. Mako and Rubin make an excellent point: "Thanks to women who came before us, Gen-X/Y women don't question whether they can become CEOs, neurosurgeons, or senators; the question confronting us is at what cost do women hold these positions?" Women no longer have to choose only one path. We can have satisfying careers and fulfilling family lives. Each woman gets to decide what is right for her.
It is clear the feminist movement has come a long way since 1948, and I want to say THANK YOU to the women who paved the way for us!